Showing posts with label african elections project. Show all posts
Showing posts with label african elections project. Show all posts

Friday, April 8, 2011

Nigeria Elections 2011 : 20 Online spaces to watch

On the eve of Nigeria parliamentary election, taking place on 9th April 2011, African Elections Project www.africanelections.org news editors' pick of 20 online spaces to watch:

1. Nigeria - The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) http://www.inecnigeria.org/

2. This day live elections 2011 http://www.thisdaylive.com/elections-2011

3. Next 234 Elections Centre http://election.234next.com/

4. The Guardian http://www.ngrguardiannews.com/

5. Nigeria Election Watch, 2011 http://www.ndi.org/nigeria

6. EU Election Observation Mission to Nigeria 2011 http://www.eueom.eu/nigeria2011/home

7. Nigeria elections 2011 http://crowdvoice.org/nigeria-elections-2011?u=1#

8. Sahara reporters http://www.saharareporters.com and http://www.saharareporters.com/spotlight/Nigerian-Election-2011

9. RFI www.english.rfi.fr/Nigeria

10. The Punch http://www.punchng.com/

11. BBC Hausa Service http://www.bbc.co.uk/hausa/

12. News Agency of Nigeria http://www.nanngronline.com

13. Radio Nigeria Online http://ww2.radionigeria.gov.ng/home2.php

14. Project 2011 Swift Count http://pscnigeria.org/swiftcount.php

15. NG 2011 Elections: Polling station locator http://ngpollingstations.appspot.com/

16. Enough is Enough(EiE) http://eienigeria.org/revoda and www.rsvp2011.org

17. Nigeria Elections http://www.nigeriaelections.org/

18. Voter Quench http://www.voteorquench.org/

19. Reclaim Naija http://www.reclaimnaija.net/

20. The Nigerian Television Authority, (NTA) http://www.nta.com.ng/

Tweets -Hash tags

#Naijavotes2011

#nigeridecides

#africanelections

#nigeria

#nigeriavotes

#naja

#nigeria

Nigeria - The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) TWITTER http://twitter.com/#!/inecnigeria

We'd Like to Hear from You!

Do you know of any interesting online space covering Nigeria Elections 2011 send us a mail at info@africanelections.org

@Africanelection

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Guinea election head convicted of fraud

The head of Guinea's election commission and a senior aide have been sentenced to a year in jail for fraud during June's presidential vote.

The verdicts are likely to increase tensions ahead of the 19 September run-off, correspondents say.

The complaint was lodged by veteran opposition leader Alpha Conde, who faces ex-Prime Minister Cellou Diallo.

The vote was seen as the first democratic election in the mineral-rich West African state since independence.

The army seized power after the death of autocratic leader Lansana Conte in 2008.

Neither men were in court to hear the verdict. National Independent Election Commission (Ceni) president Ben Sekou Sylla has been in France for medical reasons since the day after the vote.

Ceni planning director El Haj Boubacar Diallo told the AP news agency that he first learnt of the sentence against him was when a journalist phoned him for his reaction.

"I was at the office all day yesterday [Thursday]. No-one from the court called me. Not even my lawyer was told about the judge's decision," he said.

The former prime minister is seen as the favourite in the run-off after gaining 44% of the first round vote, compared to 18% for Mr Conde.

"Alpha Conde knows he cannot win. So he is using his connections inside the army and inside the interim government to try to manipulate the outcome of the vote," the Ceni planning director said.

Some fear that the vote could raise ethnic tensions in Guinea as the two men come from the country's two largest communities - Mr Diallo is a Peul and Mr Conde a Malinke.

Guinea is the world's largest exporter of the aluminium ore bauxite. It also has important deposits of iron ore.

Despite its mineral wealth, the country is one of the poorest in West Africa.

The head of Guinea's election commission and a senior aide have been sentenced to a year in jail for fraud during June's presidential vote.

The verdicts are likely to increase tensions ahead of the 19 September run-off, correspondents say.

The complaint was lodged by veteran opposition leader Alpha Conde, who faces ex-Prime Minister Cellou Diallo.

The vote was seen as the first democratic election in the mineral-rich West African state since independence.

The army seized power after the death of autocratic leader Lansana Conte in 2008.

Neither men were in court to hear the verdict. National Independent Election Commission (Ceni) president Ben Sekou Sylla has been in France for medical reasons since the day after the vote.

Ceni planning director El Haj Boubacar Diallo told the AP news agency that he first learnt of the sentence against him was when a journalist phoned him for his reaction.

"I was at the office all day yesterday [Thursday]. No-one from the court called me. Not even my lawyer was told about the judge's decision," he said.

The former prime minister is seen as the favourite in the run-off after gaining 44% of the first round vote, compared to 18% for Mr Conde.

"Alpha Conde knows he cannot win. So he is using his connections inside the army and inside the interim government to try to manipulate the outcome of the vote," the Ceni planning director said.

Some fear that the vote could raise ethnic tensions in Guinea as the two men come from the country's two largest communities - Mr Diallo is a Peul and Mr Conde a Malinke.

Guinea is the world's largest exporter of the aluminium ore bauxite. It also has important deposits of iron ore.

Despite its mineral wealth, the country is one of the poorest in West Africa.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-11258839

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Nigeria elections 2011 : It’s Official: Presidential Election to Hold Jan 22

After extensive legal and administrative brainstorming, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) yesterday released the timetable for the conduct of the 2011 general election, fixing the presidential election for January 22 next year.

The National Assembly polls will take place on January 15, while the governorship and House of Assembly elections will hold on January 29.

Any run-off for governorship and presidential election will be held seven days after the announcement of the result of the poll election.

But the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has predicted post-election crisis because of the provisions of the amended Electoral Act which now make the Court of Appeal the court of first instance (original jurisdiction) in election petitions.

NBA said the Court of Appeal would be “overwhelmed” given the number of judges it has and the number of cases it is likely to handle in the 36 states of the federation – in addition to presidential election petitions.

The election timetable, INEC said, is in line with sections 76, 178, 116 and 132 of the 1999 Constitution and section 26 of the Electoral Act, 2010, which define the dates of elections to be set by the commission.

According to the timetable released by the INEC National Commissioner in charge of Information and Publicity Committee, Prince Solomon Adedeji Soyebi, all parties’ primary elections would hold between September 11 and October 30 this year.

The last date for campaigns for the National Assembly is January 14, while the last date for the presidential campaigns is January 21. The last day for the governorship and the state Houses of Assembly is January 28. This, it said, is in line with section 99 (1) of the Electoral Act 2010, which prohibits advertisements or broadcast of campaigns 24 hours prior to the date of election.

INEC also said the publication of the list of nominated candidates for the National Assembly would take place on December 16, while the presidential list is expected to be published on December 23 and governorship and the House of Assembly on December 30.

INEC said the last day for the submission of nomination forms by political parties for the National Assembly is December 4; presidential December 7; governorship and House of Assembly December 10 and 11, while the collection of nomination forms for all categories of elections is between November 22 to 25.

Similarly, the commission said the publication of personal particulars of the candidates (form CF001) substituted candidates for the National Assembly is December 4, 2010; presidential December 11; and governorship and Assembly December 18.
INEC will publish official register of voters for the election on December 16. This, it said, is in line with section 20 of the electoral act, which provides not later than 30 dates before the election date.

The last day for the withdrawal of candidates and substitution of withdrawn candidates by political parties for the National Assembly is November 30; presidential December 7; and governorship and House of Assembly December 14.

The dates for the publication of personal particulars of the candidates in form CF001 are as follows: National Assembly November 22; presidential election is November 29 and governorship and House of Assembly December 6, 2010.
Registration of voters holds from November 1 to 14, 2010, which is in line with section 9 (5) of the electoral act. The display of voter register for claims and objection is slated for November 20 to 25.

Meanwhile, NBA has raised the alarm over what it described as the “inherent danger and risk” contained in the 2010 Electoral Act.
Speaking at the inauguration of three committees – the NBA Constitution Review, Electoral Justice Reform and Data Base and Documentation Committees – President of the association, Chief Joseph Daudu (SAN), said the law would make the determination of election petitions “a very difficult task”.

According to him, crucial preliminaries to elections such as the preparation of a credible voter register, the enactment of an Electoral Act which should correct past mistakes, the conduct of voter and other civic education, the harmonisation of all relevant electoral legislations and the disposition of post election disputes are yet to be put in place.
He said the Electoral Act 2010 would result in many post-election crises.

He said: “Section 133(1) of the Electoral Act 2010 provides that no election and return election under this Act shall be questioned in any manner other than by a petition complaining of an undue election or undue return presented to the competent tribunal or court in accordance with the Constitution or of the Act, and in which the person elected or returned is joined as a party.

"Ordinarily the above Section would not have posed a problem but for Section 133(2) of the Act which defines tribunal or court to mean in the case of the presidential or governorship election, the Court of Appeal and in the case of any other elections under the Act the election Tribunal as established under the Constitution or Act."

According to him, the implication of the foregoing is that it is the Court of Appeal that now has the original jurisdiction in the determination of governorship election disputes.

"If this is correct, it means that the unaccented amended Constitution contains amendments to Section 246(1)(b)(i)(ii) and (iii) Section 285 (2) and the 6th Schedule to the 1999 Constitution to the effect that original jurisdiction in governorship matters shall henceforth be determined by the Court of Appeal,” he added.

In his view, the new Electoral Act would overwhelm the Court of Appeal.He described the inherent risk and danger posed by the new Electoral Act thus: "First by Section 1 of the Court of Appeal Act as amended, the total number of Justices to the Court of Appeal is 70 and if that number 70 is divided by five which means is the standard panel for election cases then you have only 14 panels. Even if the constitution of the panels is reduced to three which is most undesirable one can only get 23.3 panels.

"With 36 states of the federation and usually in the heat of election petitions some states get more than two active and indeed overworked panels. The position as it appears is that there is not even one panel to go round the states.

"Ancillary to this is the fact that by section 134[2] of the Act every petition is required to be determined by the Tribunal within 180 days from the date of filling of the said petition whilst appellate tribunal has 90 days to determine the appeals to conclusion.
“These provisions ought to alert the alarm bells of any practitioner conversant with the determination of election petitions.

"If the objective of setting time limits is to achieve harmony in governance so that petitions do not continue even after elected officials have been sworn in then even the laudable objective has been defeated because the combined statutory period for the resolution of a petition is now 270 days about nine months which takes it well beyond the May 29th 2011 from the January 8th 2011 when the first election is to take place."

He said the principles of fair hearing would be trampled upon and that justices of the Court of Appeal would be grossly overworked as they have their existing cases to contend with as well as the new constitutional functions thrust on them which include the determination of appeal from the legislative houses at federal and states.

He said the NBA through its Legislative Advocacy Group recommended the setting up of a Constitutional Court with both original and appellate levels but that the National Assembly appeared to have ignored this proposal as with others submitted by the association.

Daudu has consequently constituted an Electoral Justice Reform Committee headed by Chief Mike Ahamba (SAN) with Alex Iziyon (SAN) as Alternate Chairman to examine whether the vesting of the jurisdiction as the final court to entertain governorship petition on the Supreme Court is good or bad.

He said: “Those who support this situation cite the increasing corruption in the Court of Appeal as the reason for the alleged abuse of its finality in such decisions while opponents cite the insufficiency of manpower in the apex court to effectively deal with the situation.”


Nigeria 2011 Elections Timetable

•Sept 11-Oct 30: All primaries
•Jan 15: National Assembly poll
•Jan 22: Presidential poll
•Jan 29: Governorship/ Assembly polls



http://www.thisdayonline.com/

Friday, September 3, 2010

Burkinabe President Tries to Mediate Differences between Guinea’s Presidential Candidates

The president of Guinea’s Research Institute on Democracy and Rule of Law, a non-governmental organization, says Burkinabe President Blaise Compaore is mediating talks between Guinea’s two presidential candidates.

Attorney Thierno Balde said the ongoing talks are aimed at preventing violence, as well as resolving all outstanding issues, ahead of the September 19 second round presidential vote.

“When President Blaise Compaore came to visit General Sekouba Konate two weeks ago, they agreed that he will invite the two leading candidates to Ouagadougou to hold talks and to agree on the process which will lead to the elections on September 19th,” he said.

Backed by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), President Compaore is helping Guinea’s efforts to return to constitutional rule.

There has been reported tension between the two presidential aspirants and their supporters during campaigns ahead of the vote.

Long time opposition leader Alpha Conde accused some members of the electoral commission of violating the country’s electoral code and demanded their removal ahead of the vote.

Former Prime Minister Cellou Dalein Diallo also accused Mr. Conde of having an agreement with the transitional Prime Minister, Jean-Marie Dore, to help manipulate the results of the vote.

Attorney Balde said the presidential candidates are expected to sign an agreement after the talks pledging to use legal means, not violence, to address their concerns over the results of the September vote.

“According to close [aides] of the two candidates, the idea is to have an agreement between them so that, when the elections will be organized, both of them will accept the results. And that, if they have any issue, they will use the legal means and, that no matter what happens, they will avoid using violence as a means of expressing their views,” Balde said.

He said officials in the transitional government have announced that they have been able to resolve the controversial issues surrounding the first round of voting to ensure a better second round.

International poll observers have concluded the June 27 first round vote was credible despite isolated reports of voter irregularities. It was Guinea’s first democratic vote since the country gained its independence in 1958 from France.

http://www.voanews.com/english/news/Burkinabe-President-Tries-to-Mediate-Differences-between-Guineas-Presidential-Candidates-102118689.html?utm_source=voa_news-twitter-account&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=twitterfeed

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Texts a New Tool in Guinea’s Historic Election

Mobile phones turned citizens into election observers in Guinea’s landmark presidential election. The technology will also be used to help voters in the upcoming September run-off poll.

By Kwami Ahiabenu II

On June 27, 2010, Guinea held what is widely being hailed as the nation’s first freely run democratic election since gaining independence in 1958. A run-off between the two presidential candidates earning the most votes will take place on September 19, 2010. Another first in this landmark election process is the use of mobile phone technology.

Mobile phones have become a preferred means of communication in Africa because they are convenient and affordable relative to other methods. Most countries on the continent are now recording the use of mobile phones by all key stakeholders in their elections: from electoral officials, political parties and individual candidates, to electoral security agencies, civil society organizations, and local and international observers.

Candidates use mobile phones to raise funds and campaign. Voters can use mobile phones to verify their registration information and correct it if necessary before going to the polls. Mobile phones are also used to inform citizens about voter registration, and to inform registered voters about when, where and how to vote. And, in Guinea, phones have been used as a tool for election observation.

"If you have a problem during voting, send a text message to 8080." During the first round of elections in June, this was the message that Guineans around the country received at public forums, on the radio and in newspapers. The message advertised an election-monitoring service based on SMS text messages. The SMS service used a short code number, "8080," which enabled all mobile users in Guinea, regardless of their mobile operator, to send election-related queries, comments and report problems. The service was implemented by a coalition of government, private and business partners. These included the nonprofit group Alliance Guinea, the African Elections Project, Guinea's National Independent Election Commission (CENI), mobile operators (Areeba, Cellcom, Intercel Guinee, Orange or Sotelgui) and African Business Services.

Commenting on the SMS election-monitoring service, U.S. Ambassador Patricia Moller said at a briefing before the June election: "The United States is committed to ensuring that these are the freest and most transparent elections in Guinea's history. This innovative initiative will help to make this vision a reality…By providing voters with the means to protect their vote, we have helped to place the future of their country in the palm of their hands. This technology will allow CENI, local and international observers, and security forces to respond to incidents in real time."

After voters went to the polls, Alix Davilmar of the Guinea-based African Business Services, the providers of the short code service, declared the service a success. Davilmar said: "We received about 4,000 SMS [messages] before the day of election and on the day of elections there were approximately 8,000 SMS entries. After the Election Day, over 2,000 SMS entries also came in. These messages were all posted online and distributed as e-mail alerts to election administrators and observers, international media, civil society organizations or the general public.”

The election did experience some glitches, according to the Carter Center, a U.S. NGO with expertise in observing elections which was on the ground in Guinea. In a statement, the Carter Center described some of the problems observed, “Confusion about several important aspects of voting and counting procedures, delay in allocation of polling stations, and late delivery of essential voting materials negatively affected the quality of polling.”

Despite these difficulties, the period following the election has been calm and the results respected by all parties. The Carter Center itself declared the elections a success and noted, “the elections were marked by broad political participation, a spirit of open campaigning, and transparency.”

Now all eyes are on the September poll, as Guineans prepare for the country’s return to civilian rule.

http://audiencescapes.org/texts-new-tool-guinea-historic-election-mobile-communications-carter-center

Monday, May 10, 2010

AFRICAN ELECTIONS PROJECT RANKED INGENIOUS BY INNOVATION FAIR

The African Elections Project was selected to be a part of 33 key projects out of 223 innovative projects submitted from around the globe and joined the rest of selected projects to participate in the World Bank Innovation Fair held in South Africa from the 12 – 15 of April with one of its partners International Institute for Sustainable Development.

The main theme for the occasion was "Innovation Fair: Moving beyond conflict" with a focus on two critical challenges of development in fragile states namely Communications for Governance and Service Delivery and Conflict and Violence Prevention. This initiative is directed towards uncovering a long lasting route to peace and security across the world by soliciting ideas from participating organizations. Selected participants came from over 40 countries which included India, Zimbabwe, Lebanon, Ghana, Sri Lanka, Yemen, DR Congo, Guinea-Bissau and Kenya.

This African Elections Project (AEP) was chosen for its work in the area of Communication for Governance and Service Delivery because of its innovative use of social media to develop capacity and monitor governance process prior to, during and after the elections. The project leverages the free, fair and unbiased media and the crucial role they play in elections such as providing impartial information thereby contributing to peace building during elections. .

Kwami Ahiabenu II, the representative for the African Elections Project opined that "the fair provided a platform for the exchange of ideas on how to replicate one project in a different context and how to improve ideas based on experience to reduce conflict conditions or the fear of a potential conflict.

The African Elections Project is aimed at developing the capacity of the media in ICTs in elections coverage while stimulating the provision of elections information and knowledge via its portal www.africanelections.org and other new media tools. African Elections Project has so far covered elections in Ghana, Malawi, Mauritania, Mozambique, Botswana, Togo, and Namibia with planned coverage of Cote d'Ivoire, Niger and Guinea in the pipe line. The project is coordinated by the International Institute for ICT Journalism (Penplusbytes) working hand in hand with key partners www.osisa.org and www.osiwa.org .

Signed

Jerry Sam, Project Manager,

http://www.africanelections.org/

Friday, May 7, 2010

Overview of African Elections Project

introduction
The African Elections Project is a country-specific platform giving the capacity of the media in ICTs in order for them to use it as a tool for election coverage and the provision of elections information and knowledge. It first run in 2008 in Ghana followed later by Cote d ‘lvoire and Guinea in 2009. By March 2010, it has run this project in ten countries including Malawi, Namibia, Botswana, Niger, Guinea, Mozambique, Mauritania and Togo.

It focuses on technology training for senior editors, journalists and reporters. They are also developing an election guide for journalists and civil society organizations and a mobile application to encourage citizens to engage in election monitoring.

A country-specific election portal aggregates election-related news articles, blog posts, photographs, events, and Op-Eds. Some of the countries, such as Ghana, also have detailed information about the candidates and political parties


Interview
What problem is your project aiming to overcome?:

A dearth of elections information and knowledge to aid in free and fair elections while promoting accountability and governance monitoring.
What are the roots of that problem?:

Lack of tools for elections information- and knowledge-sharing online coupled with low content generation on the continent.

Also democratic culture is relatively new in Africa, which means that supporting information- and knowledge-sharing culture is just evolving. This is true in most African countries.

There has been a slow uptake by citizen journalists to cover elections, maybe partly due to the fears elections create and also the counter-mechanisms by the competing political entities which mostly use the traditional media outlets like radio and television.

Lastly there are very few new media projects related to elections in Africa. African Elections Projects stands unique in this case.
Why did you personally become involved in this project?:

I was part of the team that conceived of the idea, therefore was part of it from day one in 2008. I have been amazed at how the project has rolled out and the possibilities of using new media it has offered.
Are you providing unofficial channels of information that should be provided by the government?:

Yes, through articles and blog postings to our web platform, especially in the area of voter education.
Why is the government not providing the information?:

We do not have any evidence to explain why such information is not provided, but we usually hear from the government that they do not have the resources to provide such information.
How does the information published on your website turn into offline change?:

It contributes to voter education and creates awareness about the electoral process. It also ensures accountability by the electoral management bodies by making them stakeholders. Information about political parties, manifestos and campaign promises invariably help stakeholders and voters make informed decisions.
How many people work on your project?:
10
How many hours a week do you personally spend on the project?:

Average 10 hours to full time during build up to elections.
How many hours does the whole team spend on the project?:

Full time for most of the team members and average of 12 hours for others.
What are the most time consuming tasks?:

Research, content generation and the uploading of content due to low bandwidth in most areas we operate from.
How do you extract value from large amounts of data? How do you build engagement around it?:

We have in house software we use to process the data plus the use of some web 2.0 tools that enable collaboration. We build engagement through enabling information and knowledge sharing.
How do you verify the identities of participants on your website?:

Contributors to our website are all registered users, so we have information about them though we do not get the information about persons posting comments since they are not required to register.
How do you attract new participants?:

Through the exchange of links, by disseminating content in our networks, and by advertising in traditional media. Also, word of mouth.
What has been the most effective method of spreading awareness about your project?:

Word of mouth through mostly online means and referrals.
What are the incentives to participate in your project?:

Contributing local content from an African prospective for the global market thus presenting the African story of elections as opposed to simply relying on foreign (non-African) online publications.
What are the biggest obstacles to your success?:

Lack of capacity by media groups to use ICT tools. This is true in all ten countries we have worked with, though of course with varying levels of capacity. But in most cases, the media is only coming to terms now with effective use of ICT tools.

Also, a lack of affordable bandwidth. I think this has been the biggest ICT infrastractural challenge. For instance in Malawi, we had to pay heavily to have even a basic connection.

Slow uptake of citizen journalism on the continent.

Democratic process - especially elections - are not yet well established in some countries hence bringing an election specific media project appears threatening to certain establishments by increasing visibility and accountability.
How do you plan on overcoming those obstacles?:

Capacity building for the media in the use of ICTS, stimulating citizen journalism, and advocating for free and fair elections.
What skills and expertise would be of assistance to your project?:

The use of ICTs in elections especially in information and knowledge sharing. Also, providing more online resources for both mainstream journalists as well as citizen journalists.
How do you plan on financially sustaining your project? :

Marketing and promoting our technical platform in the area of media monitoring, content mangament systems, and SMS to raise funds while at the same time exploring the options of advertising on our online platforms.
What other organizations are you working with?:

FrontlineSMS, Ghana Journalist Association, all Africa, Global Voices, in country news agency, electoral management bodies, MISA, SMSGH, Highway Africa, Media Foundation for West Africa, West African Democracy Radio, OSIWA, OSISA, Media Council of Malawi, Ghana Information network for knowledge sharing, in-country journalist associations.
Have you thought about developing your own tools?:

Yes, our web platform, SMS and media monitoring tools were developed in house plus we customise some web 2.0 for our use as well.

We also developed the following
1. CMS – elections portal
2. Results Manager – for presentation of results graphically, tables and maps
3. SMS System – for news production process, news broadcast and elections observations
4. Media Monitoring System
5. Video content production – customisation.

On a separate note, since we develop own own tools, we have copyright with an option to reproduce with permission.
Has there been any communication between your project and government officials?:

Yes, on regular basis, including interviews as well.
Are there any legal obstacles to your work? Any laws that should be changed?:

Freedom of information bills, when enacted, can contribute to access to information for our work.

Otherwise we have so had no legal actions against the website though we had a solicitor letter while covering Malawi Elections on content on the website.
Have there been any attempts to replicate your work elsewhere?:

We are currently worked or working in ten African countries (Ghana, Malawi, Mauritania, Togo, Niger, Cote d’Ivoire, Namibia, Mozambique, Botswana and Guinea. Otherwise AEP is original in many ways.
What other projects in your region should we know about?:

Ushadidi and in-country, elections-related websites like the Nyasa Times.
If someone gave you $10,000 how would you use the money?:

To train journalists and citizens journalist in the use of ICTs and new media while acquiring tools for them like flip cameras.
If someone gave you $100,000 how would you use the money?:

To train journalists and citizen journalists in the use of ICTs and new media while acquiring tools for them like flip cameras, satellite internet connection for our newsrooms on the go, a mobile broadcasting system, and to scale up our media monitoring platform.
What are your plans for 2010 and 2011?:

To cover 10 -15 countries having elections.
Further Questions
What metrics do you use to judge your own success?

Website:

- Usage and number of target audience reached using web metrics counted by number of visitors, where they are coming from, which websites are linking to us and repeat visitor
- Number of feedback received
- Number of reposts to other sites
How many visitors come to the AEP Portal? How many unique hits per month?

100,000. The majority of readers come from Europe and North America and are largely citizens of the countries we cover that are living abroad. Our content is reposted on other blogs, tweets, etc, and on other news organisation websites including AllAfrica.
What is the target audience?

Media, journalists, electoral management bodies, citizens and international bodies.

http://transparency.globalvoicesonline.org/project/african-elections-project